Posts Tagged ‘pope benedict xvi’

Infallibly Negligent?

Wednesday, July 14th, 2010

If the latest reports are true, I believe a case can be made… a very convincing case… that what we now have in Rome is a pope who is infallible alright… infallibly negligent, to the point of criminality.  What else can one conclude when one sees this pope chastise a cardinal who criticized another cardinal for making slight of the sexual abuse of minors perpetuated by priests and then follow this with a document that talks of the sins of sexual abuse in the same breath as the “sin” of ordaining women to the priesthood?  I guarantee you’ll soon hear spin from the Vatican, and those who think the Vatican needs defending, to the effect that one shouldn’t confuse the two sins simply because they are addressed in a single document.

(cough cough)

Well… if one shouldn’t confuse the two then why treat of them both in one fell swoop?  Why did some genius in the Vatican decide doing so would be hunky dory?  What’s behind this decision, one may well ask… contempt for the critics of the Vatican? Invincible ignorance of the impact it could have?  Stupidity?

Whatever the reason, one can rest assured that infallibility has, indeed, reared it’s ugly head for the world once again.  Please color me fallible.

ADDENDUM: Said document reportedly has been released.  Full text is available as a PDF

“…only the pope can accuse…”

Friday, July 2nd, 2010

In the latest development of an incident I commented on here a while back, here and here, Reuters News Service is reporting that the pope met with Cardinal Schönborn about his criticism of Cardinal Sodano and the Vatican issued a statement saying,

“Regarding accusations against a cardinal, we remind everyone that, in the Church, only the pope has the authority to accuse a cardinal,” said the statement, a rare case of the Church making its internal bickering public.

The full report can be read here.

I find it striking that a pope will publicly rebuke a cardinal for rebuking a cardinal.  Where, exactly, do we find this imperative in the Gospels?  Maybe we find it in Canon Law?  Anyone have a clue on this or is this a case of a pope simply throwing his weight around against a cardinal who clearly is trying to remove some of the toxin in the Church over the mishandling of sexual abuse cases?

ADDENDUM: Good article from the NY Times, “Church Office Failed to Act on Abuse Scandal.”

Cardinal Schönborn on Gays and Remarried Catholics

Saturday, May 8th, 2010

Hat tip to America Magazine’s blog, In All Things, for pointing to an article in The Tablet, in which Cardinal Schönborn, one of the principal architects of the Catholic Catechism, as well as a former student of Joseph Ratzinger (now Pope Benedict XVI), calls on the Church to reexamine it’s position “…on long-term gay relationships and remarried Catholics.”  Read the whole thing at The Tablet.  If I’m not mistaken, Cardinal Schönborn has also expressed the opinion that the Church should not consider the door closed on the discussion of the ordination of women.  Either The Tablet is completely confused or Cardinal Schönborn is truly throwing open a few windows of the Roman Church to let the Holy Spirit in.  The Cardinal apparently made the statements during an “attack” on Cardinal Sodano, who is the Dean of the College of Cardinals, for Sodano’s mishandling of the sexual abuse crisis.

That pesky media…

Monday, March 29th, 2010

The buzz in the Catholic world over the current revelations of Benedict XVI’s culpability in the mishandling of the case of a priest who confessed to child abuse has reached a new crescendo with this article at the National Catholic Reporter.  Here is an excerpt,

Time for answers

The focus now is on Benedict. What did he know? When did he know it? How did he act once he knew? (more…)

The pope apologizes…almost.

Saturday, March 20th, 2010

As reported by John Follain and Bojan Pancevski of the Times Online, Pope Benedict XVI delivered an apology to the Church in Ireland, in the form of a letter to be read at mass this Sunday, the 21st of March.  In it he says he is sorry…

“You have suffered grievously and I am truly sorry … It is understandable that you find it hard to forgive or be reconciled with the church. In her name, I openly express the shame and remorse that we all feel,” Benedict writes in the seven-page letter, the first public apology of its kind.

“I know that nothing can undo the wrong you have endured. Your trust has been betrayed and your dignity violated … We are all scandalised by the sins and failures of some of the church’s members.”

This whole affair of sexual abuse in the Catholic Church and, more importantly, the way it is being handled has now come to a crashing crescendo if the report is true.  If the former Archbishop Ratzinger and now current Pope Benedict flat out refuses to demand that all cases of sexual abuse by priests and religious be reported to the police then the heart of the matter remains untouched and I can’t see how any apology makes any difference whatsoever.

So let my opinion be clear here.  If this part of this report is true:

Nor has the Pope ordered bishops or priests to report sexual abuse to the police when they learn of it, as Irish victims’ groups demanded.

…then what the pope knew in 1980 is important… but not the final nail in the coffin.  What he is NOT doing and saying now is the final nail.

web analytics

Switch to our mobile site


Aggiornare Professionista Theme by The GeekDesignGirl Project